Which of the following makes it more likely that a child will be bullied

*
Systematic worldwide research study has displayed school bullying to be a frequent and significant public wellness problem. But psychologists are utilizing this study to develop bullying avoidance programs that are being applied in colleges approximately the human being.

You watching: Which of the following makes it more likely that a child will be bullied


Bullying at college is an age-old trouble and until freshly, many type of took the "children will be children" mindset towards the problem. However, college violence instances - including the Columbine institution shooting tragedy - highlight the major and at some point deadly consequences of bullying habits. In response, educators and also politicians are turning to psychologists such as Dan Olweus, PhD, of Norway, well-known as a pioneer and "beginning father" of research on bullying and also victimization.

Olweus specifies school bullying in a general means as "recurring negative, ill-intentioned behavior by one or more students directed versus a student who has actually challenge defending himself or herself. Many bullying occurs without any evident provocation on the component of the student that is exposed."

In his 1993 book, Bullying at school: What we recognize and also what we deserve to carry out, Dr. Olweus identifies characteristics of students that are most likely to be bullies and also those that are the majority of likely to be victims of bullying. Bullies tfinish to exhilittle the complying with characteristics:

They have actually a solid need to dominate and also subdue other students and also to gain their very own way

Are impulsive and are quickly angered

Are regularly defiant and also aggressive toward adults, consisting of paleas and also teachers

Sjust how little bit empathy toward students who are victimized

If they are boys, they are physically stronger than boys in general

The typical passive or submissive victims, according to Olweus" research study, generally have some of the following characteristics:

Are careful, sensitive, quiet, withdrawn and shy

Are often anxious, insecure, unhappy and also have actually low self-esteem

Are depressed and also connect in suicidal ideation a lot more regularly than their peers

Often carry out not have a single excellent friend and also relate better to adults than to peers

If they are boys, they may be physically weaker than their peers

These qualities are likely to be both a partial reason and also a repercussion of the bullying. Tright here is also another, much smaller sized group of victims, referred to as provocative victims or bully-victims, with partly different attributes, consisting of regular reading and writing troubles and also ADHD characteristics. The habits of the bully-victims has a tendency to elicit negative reactions from many type of students in the classroom, and also the teacher regularly dislikes them likewise.

Bullies and victims normally occupy vital positions in the configuration of bully/victim problems in a classroom, but various other students likewise play crucial functions. The "Bullying Circle" mirrors the miscellaneous means in which a lot of students in a classroom via bully/victim problems are affiliated in or influenced by them. Certain team mechanisms such as social contagion and also diffusion of obligation have likewise been determined as facilitating factors when a number of students take component in the bullying.

Psychological study has debunked numerous myths linked through bullying, including one that states bullies are usually the most unrenowned students in school. A 2000 study by psychologist Philip Rodkin, PhD, and also colleagues involving fourth-through-sixth-grade boys found that extremely aggressive boys might be among the the majority of renowned and also socially associated kids in elementary classrooms, as regarded by their fellow students and also even their teachers. Anvarious other myth is that the hard and aggressive bullies are basically anxious and also insecure people who usage bullying as a way of compensating for negative self-esteem. Using a number of different approaches consisting of projective tests and also stress hormones, Olweus concludes that tbelow is no support for such a watch. Most bullies had actually average or better than average self-esteem.

How common is bullying? A 2001 study by psychologist Tonja Nansel, PhD, and also colleagues entailing even more than 15,000 UNITED STATE students in qualities 6 via 10 discovered that 17 percent of students reported having been bullied "sometimes" or more regularly during the institution year. Approximately 19 percent shelp they bullied others "sometimes" or even more frequently and six percent reported both bullying others and being a victim of bullying.

Tbelow are clearly more boys than girls who bully others, and also a relatively huge percentage of girls - some 50 % - report that they are greatly bullied by boys. Although bullying is a better trouble among boys, tbelow occurs an excellent deal of bullying among girls also. Bullying with physical implies is much less common among girls who generally usage even more subtle and also indirect means of harassment such as excluding someone from the group, spreading of rumors, and also manipulation of friendship relationships. Such develops of bullying can definitely be as harmful and distressing as more direct and open forms of strikes.


Dr. Olweus"s research study has resulted in the advancement of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program, a comprehensive, multilevel, school-wide regime designed to reduce and prevent bullying among students in elementary, middle, and also junior high schools. As component of a governpsychological initiative, the regime is readily available to all of Norway"s public institutions. A flourishing variety of schools in the U.S. now use the routine, which was figured out by the College of Colorado"s Center for the Study and also Prevention of Violence as among elalso Blueprint or Model Programs for Violence Prevention. Six large-scale evaluations of the routine over a duration of more than 20 years have surrendered fairly positive results, including the following:

Substantial reductions - frequently in the 30-50 percent range - in the frequency via which students report being bullied and also bullying others; equivalent reductions have been derived with peer ratings

Significant reductions in students" reports of general antisocial behavior such as vandalism, theft, drunkenness, and also truancy

Huge improvements in the "social climate" of the course, as reflected in students" reports of enhanced order and also technique, even more positive social relationships, and a more positive mindset toward schoolwork and school

Improvements in students" satisfaction with institution life.

Partial replications of the routine in England also and the United States have actually additionally surrendered positive, though rather weaker results.

The treatment regime is developed on 4 key ethics. These ethics involve producing a school - and ideally, additionally a home - setting defined by: (1) warmth, positive interest, and also involvement from adults; (2) firm limits on unacceptable behavior; (3) regular application of non-punitive, non-physical sanctions for unacceptable habits and violation of rules, and, (4), adults who act as authorities and also positive role models. The regime works both at the school, the classroom and also the individual levels, and also crucial goals are to readjust the "chance and reward structures" for bullying actions, leading to fewer methods and also rewards for bullying.

The research study of Olweus, along with that of other psychologists such as Susan Limber, Ph.D., of Clemboy College, is additionally being supplied as component of a bullying avoidance campaign introduced in 2004 by the United States Department of Health and Person Services, "Take A Stand also. Lfinish A Hand also. Soptimal Bullying Now!". The campaign also attributes television and radio public company announcements.

Various various other bullying avoidance initiatives are defined in a book edited by three crucial contributors to the field, psychologists Peter Smith, PhD (UK), Debra Pepler, PhD (Canada), and also Kenneth Rigby, PhD (Australia): School Bullying: How effective have the right to interventions be? (2004).


Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, D.C.: Hemispbelow (Wiley).

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What we recognize and what we can carry out.

See more: Bus Mang Chap 3 Flashcards

Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Olweus, D. (2001). Olweus" core routine against bullying and antisocial behavior: A teacher handbook. HEMIL-senteret, Universitetet i Bergen, N-5015 Bergen, Normeans.

Olweus, D. (2002) A profile of bullying at institution. Educational Leadership, Vol.60, pp. 12-17.

Olweus, D. (2004). Bullying at school: Prevalence estimation, a useful testimonial design, and also a brand-new national initiative in Normeans. Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry Occasional Papers. No. 23, pp. 5-17.

Olweus, D., & Limber, S. (1999). Blueprints for violence prevention: Bullying Prevention Program. Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Solberg, M. & Olweus, D. (2003) Prevalence estimation of college bullying through the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior. Vol 29. pp. 239-268.

Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.) (2001). Peer harassment in college. New York: Guilford Publications.

Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the Amerideserve to Medical Association, Vol. 285, pp. 2094-2100.

Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R. & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of well-known boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, Vol. 36, No. 1., pp. 14-24.

See more: Which Of The Following Topics Would Lend Itself To A Formal Style Of Writing Only?

Smith, P.K., Pepler, D., & Rigby, K. (Eds.) (2004). Bullying in schools: How successful deserve to interventions be? Cambridge College Press.

sarkariresultonline.info Monitor on Psychology article: New means to sheight bullying

Olweus Bullying Prevention Program Internet site E-mail Olweus Bullying Prevention Program