Home / which of the following is least likely to be associated with a collectivist culture? Which of the following is least likely to be associated with a collectivist culture? 04/04/2021 Search databasePMCAll DatabasesAssemblyBiocollectionsBioProjectBioSampleBioSystemsBooksClinVarConoffered DomainsdbGaPdbVarGeneGenomeGEO DataSetsGEO ProfilesGTRHomoloGeneIdentical Protein GroupsMedGenMeSHsarkariresultonline.info Web Sitesarkariresultonline.info CatalogNucleotideOMIMPMCPopSetProteinProtein ClustersProtein Family ModelsPubChem BioAssayPubChem CompoundPubChem SubstancePubMedSNPSRAStructureTaxonomyToolKitToolKitAllToolKitBookghDamian R Murray2Department of Psychology, College of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4Mark Schaller2Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4Further Material Provides the data analysed including: pathogen ubiquity scores, individualism/collectivism scores, and human being region or culture cluster designationsPathogenic illness impose selection pressures on the social behaviour of host populations. In people (Homo sapiens), many kind of emotional sensations appear to serve an antipathogen defence feature. One wide implication is the presence of cross-social differences in huguy cognition and behaviour contingent upon the loved one visibility of pathogens in the regional ecology. We focus specifically on one fundamental social variable: distinctions in individualistic versus collectivist worths. We suggest that certain behavioral manifestations of collectivism (e.g. ethnocentrism, conformity) deserve to inhilittle the transmission of pathogens; and so we hypothedimension that collectivism (compared via individualism) will even more often characterize societies in regions that have historically had actually better pervasiveness of pathogens. Drawing on epidemiological information and the findings of global cross-nationwide surveys of individualism/collectivism, our results support this hypothesis: the regional pervasiveness of pathogens has actually a solid positive correlation via cultural indications of collectivism and also a solid negative correlation with individualism. The corconnections remajor significant even once controlling for potential confounding variables. These outcomes assist to describe the origin of a paradigmatic cross-cultural difference, and also reveal formerly unrecorded results of pathogenic diseases on the variable nature of human cultures.You watching: Which of the following is least likely to be associated with a collectivist culture?Keywords: collectivism, humale society, individualism, infectious condition, pathogens, social behaviour1. IntroductionDisease-causing pathogens recurrent considerable environmental dangers that should be managed or avoided all together. Selection pressures implemented by pathogens show up to have had an influence on the psychology and also social behaviour of many type of species, including primates (Freeland 1976; Møller et al. 1993; Loehle 1995). Humans are no exception. Infectious diseases have been agents of morbidity and also mortality throughout huguy history (Anderchild & May 1991; Ewald 1994; Dobkid & Carper 1996; Wolfe et al. 2007), and a prospering body of empirical research study suggests that human being possess emotional mechanisms that serve the function of antipathogen defence. For circumstances, ethnocentrism, xenophobia and other particular creates of interindividual prejudice appear to result, in part, from the operation of these mechanisms (e.g. Faulkner et al. 2004; Navarrete & Fessler 2006; Park et al. 2007).As is the case with immune defence more mostly (Zuk & Stoehr 2002; Hanssen et al. 2004), tright here are potential expenses and also benefits linked via mental and also behavioural antipathogen defences. One consequence is the activation of these mechanisms contingent upon cues indicating vulnercapacity to the transmission of pathogens. To the extent that individuals are more delicate (or perceive themselves to be more vulnerable) to the hazards posed by transmittable illness, those people present more powerful proof of cognitions and perspectives that serve an antipathogen defence feature (Faulkner et al. 2004; Navarrete & Fessler 2006; Navarrete et al. 2007; Park et al. 2007; Schaller & Duncan 2007).This type of contingency might manifest not simply in differences between individual persons, however in distinctions in between huguy cultures. To the degree that specific forms of social behaviour (and the specific emotional mechanisms underlying those behaviours) serve an antipathogen defence function, then those behaviours (and the underlying mechanisms) are even more likely to characterize the social populations within which tbelow has historically been greater pervasiveness of disease-resulting in pathogens. Prior research reflects that global varicapability in pathogen ubiquity predicts particular kinds of cultural differences, consisting of distinctions in food preparation (Shermale & Billing 1999), marital relationship structures (Low 1990), parenting methods (Quinlan 2007) and mate preferences (Gangestad et al. 2006). We emphasis here on the multifaceted value units of individualism and also collectivism, which are basic to social scientists" descriptions of culture and also cross-social differences (e.g. Triandis 1995; Hofstede 2001). Indeed, it has actually been suggested that the individualism/collectivism dimension ‘might eventually prove to be the many crucial measurement for capturing cultural variation’ (Heine 2008, p. 189). But it has continued to be largely a riddle regarding why some cultures are even more individualistic while others are even more collectivistic. We suggest that collectivism (in contrast to individualism) serves an antipathogen defence function, and for this reason is more likely to arise and persist within populaces that historically have actually been identified by a higher prevalence of pathogens.See more: What Is DepressionThe logical basis of this hypothesis is evident in at least 2 specifying attributes of collectivistic (versus individualistic) value systems. First, collectivists make sharp distinctions in between coalitional in-groups and out-teams, whereas among individualists the in-group/out-group distinction is typically weaker (Gelfand also et al. 2004). A consequence is that collectivists are more wary of call through foreigners and also other out-group members (Sagiv & Schwartz 1995). This xenophobic perspective have the right to serve an reliable antipathogen function by inhibiting exposure to novel pathogens. A second, yet no much less critical, difference between these social worth units lies in their various emphases on conformity versus the tolerance for deviance. Collectivism is identified by a solid worth put on tradition and also conformity, whereas individualism is identified by a higher tolerance for (and also encouragement of) deviation from the standing quo (Oishi et al. 1998; Cukur et al. 2004). Given that many specific heritages and standards (such as those pertaining to food preparation; e.g. Sherguy & Billing 1999) can serve as buffers against pathogen transmission, deviance from the standing quo might pose a contagion hazard to self and also others, whereas conformity helps to keep the integrity of these ritualized buffers against illness. In sum, the behavioral manifestations of collectivism (compared via the behavioural manifestations of individualism) are even more most likely to carry out defence against the dangers posed by pathogens.Individualistic values may promote various other kinds of sensible benefits. For instance, the discovery or spread of useful new innovations may occur even more commonly when people are urged to deviate from existing legacies and also engage in interactions via non-team members. In geographical regions characterized by fairly low pathogen stress, the benefits of collectivism (in terms of antipathogen defence) may be minimal, compared through the benefits linked through individualism. Under these eco-friendly circumstances, individualistic values might be more adaptive. However, within geographical areas identified by a higher pervasiveness of pathogens, the useful benefits of collectivism would certainly likewise be greater, and might outweigh whatever before benefits are conferred by individualistic tendencies. Under these circumstances, collectivistic values are most likely to be more adaptive. It adheres to that global variation in the historical ubiquity of pathogens need to predict modern social tendencies towards individualistic versus collectivistic values.See more: Which Of The Following Is Not True Of Dialects? Do You Speak AmericanIndirectly constant via this hypothesis is the monitoring that, just as transmittable diseases are frequently even more prevalent in equatorial regions (Guernier et al. 2004), equatorial cultures likewise tfinish to be even more collectivistic than societies at greater latitudes (Hofstede 2001). However before, to day, no empirical proof has directly tested the hypothesis linking worldwide variability in pathogen prevalence to cultural variation in individualism/collectivism.