What does lincoln mean by laying strong hand upon the colored element?

l>Letter by Abraham Lincoln to Albert Hodges
Home |News |Books |Speeches |Places |Resources |Education | Timelines | Index |Search

Letter to Albert G. Hodges

This letter is a summary of a conversation which President Abraham Lincoln had with 3 Kentuckians: Governor Thomas E. Bramlette, Albert Hodges, and also Archibald Dixon. Hodges was the editor of the Frankfort Republic and also Dixon served in the UNITED STATE Senate from 1852 to 1855. Bramlette had actually protested the recruiting of babsence regiments in Kentucky.

You watching: What does lincoln mean by laying strong hand upon the colored element?

Lincoln closed through a referral to slavery that is reminiscent of his second inaugural deal with of 1865: "If God now wills the removal of a good wrong, and also wills also that we of the North as well as you of the South, shall pay reasonably for our complicity in that wrong, impartial background will uncover therein new reason to attest and revere the justice and goodness of God."

Answer the questions listed below after reading the letter.

Executive Mansion,Washington, April 4, 1864.A.G. Hodges, EsqFrankfort, Ky.My dear Sir: You ask me to put in creating the substance of what I verbally sassist the various other day, in your existence, to Governor Bramlette and also Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember as soon as I did not so think, and feel. And yet I have never interpreted that the Presidency conferred upon me an unminimal best to act officially upon this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would, to the ideal of my capability, preserve, defend, and also defend the Constitution of the USA. I might not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it my watch that I can take an oath to acquire power, and also break the oath in utilizing the power. I taken, too, that in plain civil administration this oath also forbade me to practically indulge my main abstract judgment on the ethical question of slavery. I had actually publicly claimed this many type of times, and in many type of methods. And I aver that, to this particular day, I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and also feeling on slaexceptionally. I did understand also but, that my oath to keep the constitution to the best of my ability, applied upon me the duty of keeping, by eexceptionally indispensable implies, that federal government -- that country -- of which that constitution was the organic regulation. Was it feasible to lose the country, and yet keep the constitution? By basic law life and limb should be protected; yet often a limb need to be amputated to conserve a life; yet a life is never wisely given to conserve a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, can come to be lawful, by becoming indispensable to the conservation of the constitution, via the conservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and also now avow it. I could not feel that, to the ideal of my capacity, I had also tried to maintain the constitution, if, to save slavery, or any type of minor matter, I must permit the wreck of federal government, country, and also Constitution all together. When, at an early stage in the war, Gen. Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable requirement. When a small later, Gen. Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable requirement. When, still later on, Gen. Hunter attempted military emancipation, I aobtain forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had actually come. When, in March, and also May, and also July 1862 I made earnest, and also succeeding appeals to the border states to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable need for armed forces emancipation, and also arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that meacertain. They decreased the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, moved to the alternate of either surrendering the Union, and also through it, the Constitution, or of laying solid hand also upon the colored element. I decided the latter. In selecting it, I hoped for greater obtain than loss; but of this, I was not completely confident. More than a year of trial currently reflects no loss by it in our international relationships, none in our residence famous sentiment, none in our white armed forces pressure, -- no loss by it any type of exactly how or any wright here. On the contrary, it mirrors a get of rather a hundred and also thirty thousand also soldiers, seamen, and laborers. These are palpable facts, around which, as facts, tbelow deserve to be no cavilling. We have the men; and also we can not have had them without the meacertain.

See more: Mgt4810 Ch 2 Flashcards

<">And now let any Union guy who comlevels of the measure, test himself by creating down in one line that he is for subduing the rebellion by force of arms; and also in the following, that he is for taking these hundred and thirty thousand males from the Union side, and also placing them wbelow they would certainly be yet for the measure he condemns. If he have the right to not confront his instance so proclaimed, it is just because he deserve to not confront the truth.

See more: How To Enlarge Your Pennies With Your Hands For Free, How To Enlarge Your Penis In 90 Days Using

<">I include a word which was not in the verbal conversation. In telling this tale I attempt no compliment to my very own sagacity. I case not to have regulated events, yet confess plainly that occasions have actually managed me. Now, at the finish of three years struggle the nation"s condition is not what either party, or any male devised, or supposed. God alone deserve to claim it. Whither it is tfinishing appears simple. If God now wills the removal of a great wrong, and also wills also that we of the North and also you of the South, shall pay fairly for our complicity in that wrong, impartial history will certainly discover therein new cause to attest and revere the justice and goodness of God. Yours truly,A. Lincoln

Examine Lincoln"s explanation and recognize his significant disagreements. After analysis the letter, answer the complying with concerns and also carry them to course. You will certainly use them in a creating assignment.


1. Identify Lincoln"s allude of see. To whom was Lincoln writing? Identify them. Why is he writing to them? What was his purpose?2. What was the context in which he created the letter? Keep in mind the year and month. What essential advancements were going on?3. What distinction does he make between individual see and public duties?4. What points was Lincoln making by using the analogy of amputating a limb to conserve a life?5. What vital points does Lincoln make in explaining just how and also why he adjusted in his strategy to Emancipation?6. According to Lincoln, would the country have had the manpower vital to win the battle without the Emancipation Proclamation and also the enlistment of African-American soldiers and sailors?7. Why did Lincoln believe that the Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863, did not violate his sacred oath to uporganize the Constitution?8. What did Lincoln mean as soon as he composed, "I insurance claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have actually regulated me?"9. What role did Lincoln play in emancipation?10. How reliable a document is this in understanding Lincoln"s emancipation policy?