Using the same word twice in a sentence is called

Using a word twice in a row isn’t constantly a no-no, however there’s constantly a more elegant means to revise a sentence in which you could initially be inclined to repeat a word immediately. When words collide, attempt these approaches:

1. “What you do perform is your own company.”Even if this sentence is intended as a counterpoint to a “what you don’t do” proposition, the emphatic initially do is superfluous (“What you do is your own business”). If you should retain the repetition, introduce a separating phrase: “What you perform decide to execute is your own service.”

2. “They had had many type of debates.”Relocation the second had with a prepositional phrase (“They had actually gotten into many arguments”) or a much more certain verb (“They had actually endured many kind of arguments”), or introduce more vivid imagery into a revision (“They had verbally sparred many kind of times”).

You watching: Using the same word twice in a sentence is called

3. “I verified her her message.”Relocation one pronoun — preferably, both of the pronouns — with a noun (“I verified my sister the woman’s message”). This isn’t a problem with him, bereason 2 forms of the pronoun would show up (“I proved him his message”), though, aget, if him and his describe different men, it might be much better to specify, in place of one pronoun or the various other, among the guys in question.

4. “He came in in disarray.”Relocation the prepositional phrase with a basic verb (“She entered in disarray”).

5. “She gives in in eextremely case.”Simply reactors the last expression (“She offers in every time”) or flip the expression to the front (“In every case, she provides in”).

6. “What it is is a travesty.”“What it is” is always an unnecessarily verbose method to begin a sentence. Start through the subject (“It’s a travesty”).

7. “I inserted the card I had actually written on on the desk.”Reactors the prepositional expression “written on” via on at its head (“I put the card on which I had created the note on the desk”). But initially confirm that the editing phrase involving written is essential at all.

8. “We realize that that will not be satismanufacturing facility.”Rearea the second that via a noun (“We realize that the proposal will not be satisfactory”).

9. “We will comment on this this evening.”Relocation the initially this with a pronoun (“We will comment on it this evening”) or a noun (“We will certainly discuss the issue this evening”).

10. “Is tbelow someone I have the right to talk to to deal with the issue?”Employ a participial expression in place in the infinitive expression “to resolve” (“Is there someone I deserve to talk to around reresolving the issue?”) or amplify the second to by replacing it with the phrase “in order to” (“Is there someone I have the right to talk to in order to solve the issue?”).

Occasionally, an instant repetition of a word, separated from the first circumstances by punctuation, is correct for emphatic result (“I have come below from much, much away”). At other times, also though punctuation sepaprices the repetition, a reactors would enhance the sentence. For example, “Even though I was there, tright here didn’t seem to be anything for me to do” might be revised to “Even though I was tbelow, I didn’t seem to be of any type of use” or “Regardless of my presence, tright here didn’t seem to be anything for me to perform.”

Want to enhance your English in 5 minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our composing tips and also exercises daily!

Keep learning! Browse the Layout category, inspect our renowned posts, or choose a connected article below:


*
You will improve your English in only 5 minutes per day, guaranteed! Subscribers acquire accessibility to our archives with 800+ interactive exercises! You"ll also acquire three bonus ebooks completely free! Try It Free Now

12 Responses to “What to Do When Words Appear Twice in a Row”

Oliver Lawrenceon November 22, 2011 8:14 am

2) Sindicate “They had frequently argued” implements the ordinary language principle of using a vivid verb quite than a weak verb + nominalization (had actually + arguments).

3) As you say, better to avoid making use of 2 pronouns together unmuch less it is unequivocally clear to whom they each refer.

See more: Why You Should Learn A Foreign Language Persuasive Speech, Sandra Botha :: Persuasive Speech

5) “She constantly offers in” is the noticeable simplification.

7) “I put the card on which I had actually written the note on the desk” might easily make some readers stumble, reasoning that “the note on the desk” is the object of “written”. Conversely, “I took the card on which I had created the note, and also I put it on the desk”.

8) “We realize that will certainly not be satisfactory” is also simpler.

Demosthenekid November 22, 2011 11:16 am

I primarily usage FrameMaker, and it automatically pings repetitive words. It is exceptionally hard to discourage in cases when they are, in fact, desired. It will certainly mostly allow you to use words in a specific file, yet not repeated words.

I wrote a chapter on mnemonics recently, and I used medical examples. Tbelow is a mnemonic for the cranial nerves that begins “Oh, Oh, Oh,” and then continues to a vivid and also memorable image. FrameMaker HATES this. I have had actually to rephrase it as “Oh, Ooh, Oh.”

Clinton November 22, 2011 3:31 pm

When using in dialogue, would certainly inserting a comma be acceptable in the situation of:“What it is, is a travesty!”?Or perhaps adding an ellipsis,“What it is. . . is a travesty.”?

Anvarious other easily correctable, however prevalent blunder I’ve encountered:“Is that that point that’s been smelling so awful?”

Mark Nicholon November 22, 2011 8:09 pm

Clint:

If you need to repeat is in such a construction, yes, insert a comma.

Retta McSweeneyon November 23, 2011 1:33 am

Tright here you are making use of that horrendous word “got” formation in the second example. To say “They had actually acquired into many arguments” is a very negative instance of excellent English. “They had actually previous arguments” or “They had actually been in many arguments” would certainly definitely work better and certainly sound much better than “gotten”, which sounds so gutteral.

Paul Mon November 24, 2011 4:15 pm

I kbrand-new someone would pounce on “gotten”. I agree in this case, although probably not so vehemently, that it just sounds favor poor grammar.

It seems that double words are used finest in dialogue I think, where it tends to be most uncovered.

Rainon November 25, 2011 8:46 pm

This is valuable advice. In fact, after reading it I went and also changed a few instances of “had had” in the novel I’m writing.

But what carry out you execute as soon as you can’t readjust it? In one component of my novel, the phrase “They had had personalities” appears at the finish of a paragraph. I cannot readjust the structure of the sentence without changing the entire paragraph because I aim to usage the parallelism in sentence structure to convey a sarcasm which is vital in that allude in the story; I checked the (excellent) thesaurus I normally use once composing, and namong the synonyms for ‘have’ appears to work or have actually the preferred impact (“They had owned personalities” simply sounds silly). What would you carry out in such a situation?

Thanks for the advice. =)

/ Rain

venqaxon December 03, 2011 7:33 pm

I assume the anti-gottenists are not Americans, to whom, gained sounds not only fine, yet correct and also natural. Personally, I check out no should stop the double words in many cases. I think it comes off fine to say, “What is is is not the issue”. BUT, what is not acceptable is sindicate skipping the repetion and also not re-wording, as in, “Is there someone I have the right to talk to resolve this issue?” or “She gives in eexceptionally instance.” That happens in speech with fair frequency.

Culleyon March 22, 2018 8:37 am

Using words that are the exact same back to ago the means your all utilizing them is referred to as the I wantitis choose gingivitis. Your neglected you have actually the I wantitis

Twinkleon June 11, 2018 10:06 am

Is this sentence correct?I wish if somebody would certainly ask me if i am happy.

EDTon May 01, 2019 11:31 am


Twinkle –

That’s correct if you make a wish in the instance that someone asks you if you’re happy. However, you likely suppose to say:

I wish that somebody would ask me if I am happy.

I hope you’re happy now.

See more: Six Traits Of Writing

Jasonon June 19, 2020 5:17 am

“What it is” is often used as a way to place emphasis on the word “is.” That’s not something conveniently completed via either “it’s” or even “it is”:

“I think that’s fantastic!”“No, what it (really) IS is awful.”

That doesn’t have rather the exact same result as “No, IT’S awful” or “No, it IS awful.”

I expect one might say, “No, actually, it’s awful,” and also relocate the emphasis to “actually.” But if that’s the instance, then the trouble isn’t through the expression “what it is” being “constantly verbose,” since the solution is also more verbose.